In adopting this chapter, the city is relying on its police power pursuant to Article II, section 5 and 7, of the California Constitution. In accordance with the case of Erlich v. City of Culver City (1996) 12 Cal.4th 854, the requirement to provide public art and/or pay a public art in lieu fee in accordance with this chapter is akin to traditional land-use regulations imposing design conditions, and a valid exercise of the city’s traditional police power. The requirements of this chapter, including the requirement concerning providing public art in a location reasonably accessible to the public, like other design and landscaping requirements, are aesthetic controls within the city’s authority.